<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Design Workplace &#187; top 10 rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webdesignworkplace.com/tag/top-10-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webdesignworkplace.com</link>
	<description>Affordable Web Design Integrated with SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Game: Hundreds of Google # 1 Rankings</title>
		<link>http://webdesignworkplace.com/219/250-google-1-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://webdesignworkplace.com/219/250-google-1-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>einstein99</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learn About SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google # 1 Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google number one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10 rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignworkplace.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In July 2009 I set a new personal record for my clients: 250 # 1 Google Rankings and 1,000 + Google Page One Top 10 Rankings. Wow. That&#8217;s a lot. I&#8217;m talking in very short sentences. It&#8217;s a milestone in the 8 years I&#8217;ve been studying and working on SEO really. Search pundits will frequently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In July 2009 I set a new personal record for my clients:</strong></p>
<p>250 # 1 Google Rankings and</p>
<p>1,000 +  Google Page One Top 10 Rankings.</p>
<p>Wow. That&#8217;s a lot. I&#8217;m talking in very short sentences. It&#8217;s a milestone in the 8 years I&#8217;ve been studying and working on SEO really. Search pundits will frequently say at panel discussions these days &#8220;oh, the rankings mean nothing, leads and client satisfaction are what counts&#8221;. The reality is that these rankings were 90%  GEO + AOP meaning geographic area + area of practice so they were local and perfectly relevant to users searches. They generated a ton of leads. My clients were bawow happy. Me too. Rankings are getting less meaningful and I&#8217;ll discuss that in another post but these are solid GEO + AOP rankings and they are not necessarily effected by the physical location of the searcher the way personal search works.</p>
<p>Best of all, my entire collection of Google # 1&#8242;s and Top 10&#8242;s is all 100% pure white hat with no artificial ingredients of any kind.</p>
<p>What does that mean really? &#8220;There were 250 Google Number 1 rankings&#8221;. It means that on hundreds of phrases my clients wanted on their keyword lists, these phrases hit big. All the way to the top. What we also find in SEO is that similar phrases and derivative phrases frequently hit big. So for example if we hit # 1 for a phrase like:</p>
<p>New York City cosmetic surgery</p>
<p>We might also hit for:</p>
<p>New York City cosmetic surgeon</p>
<p>There are hundreds of factors involved literally, and I have to think a little bit of luck as well. I don&#8217;t want you to think anything in SEO Theory involves magic, it&#8217;s just that with competition that difficult I have to feel lucky that I won top spots in some cases.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://webdesignworkplace.com/blog-posts/250-google-num-ones.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webdesignworkplace.com/219/250-google-1-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

